This note continues our story of deriving the geodesic equation for surfaces in described as the graph of a function . This third derivation represents a substantial simplification by taking the extrinsic viewpoint, where we work entirely in Euclidean 3-space and describe geodesics as curves whose acceleration is at all times normal to the surface. This is by far the most efficient of the three approaches to date!
To set some notation: if is a twice differentiable function we parameterize its graph by the embedding ,
(Graph Geodesics)The curve in the plane represents a geodesic on the graph of if
Acceleration & Surface Normal
Exactly as in a multivariable calculus course, we can find the normal to the surface by finding two tangents to the parameterization and taking their cross product:
The second quantity we need is the acceleration of a particle traveling along the surface. Such a particle can be specified by giving as a function of time, as its trajectory is
The velocity is the first time derivative
The acceleration is then the second time derivative
Where
This last quantity is a bit of a mouthful so we will often denote it , and write
The Geodesic Condition
A curve on the surface is a geodesic only if it does not turn relative to the surface. Of course, it must bend (and thus accelerate) in as it is constrained to the surface! What’s constrained to be zero is its intrinsic acceleration: the projection of this Euclidean acceleration onto the tangent plane of the surface. Thus for a geodesic, the Euclidean acceleration must be perpendicular to the surface: it must be parallel to the surface normal at each point. To get an equation out of this we take advantage of the cross product, and note the geodesic condition implies
We can expand this out into three equations (one for each component) since we know these vectors explicitly:
Setting the first two of these to zero yields the relations
And any functions satisfying these two automatically satisfy the third equation, as
Thus the first two equations specify a geodesic.
Algebraic Simplification
All that remains is some algebraic simplification: we would like equations directly giving and , but at the moment both of these terms also appear inside of so are mixed up in the two equations. To simplify, it is useful to remember the third equation (which we know to be satisfied):
This proves useful as it will let us replace terms containing with and vice versa. Indeed, focusing on the equation for we can write
But now replacing with the equivalent we have
Moving this second term to the other side allows us to solve for :
The situation is symmetric under the exchange of and so analogous reasoning gives